A rollback crosses a content compatibility boundary

What to change

Ask the supplier to identify whether code and content must be restored as a compatible pair. Review the change that altered the structure and test the proposed rollback target against the intended content snapshot. If there is no safe direct reversal, record the alternative repair route before the next risky release. The practice should understand which versions can work together without needing to infer compatibility from similar filenames or reassuring deployment labels.

A worked example

Illustrative example

Illustrative test: A sample guide using the changed field renders correctly in the proposed restored pair.

How to check the result

The chosen recovery combination produces complete expected content.

A mistake to avoid

Restoring code alone can expose incompatibility with newer content structures.

Your action checklist

Use these checks to prepare a discussion with your team or supplier. Tick a check when you have recorded the decision or evidence, rather than when a feature has simply been promised.

Decisions to recordIdentify structural content changes since the proposed rollback target.Pair the target with its compatible content snapshot.Test representative pages before approving the recovery route.

Evidence, open questions and decisionsNext action and responsible role

Entries stay in this page and are not submitted to Kay & Co. Download your notes before leaving; the page does not save them.